Although there was consistent and you may convergent scientific literature towards the connection theory plus the negative and positive reflexes that secure and you will vulnerable styles, correspondingly, produce for the wedded life, zero studies was in fact unearthed that likewise checked-out the brand new details stated in this research, exhibiting which ones dichotomously discriminate this new attachment layout in addition to the fresh new magnitude away from discrimination. Identifying the team out of points that characterizes each one of the accessory styles and you will exhibiting which things feel the top energy of discrimination would be a relevant results that will point to research and input agendas to own couples therapy.
Within sense, the objective of this study were to assess if the correspondence, marital variations, solution, volume and you will concentration of conflicts details carry out discriminate individuals with secure and you will insecure accessory within the heterosexual matchmaking. Thus, the fresh new hypothesis checked is the bad correspondence, actions regarding assault and you can prevention, volume and concentration of problems parameters carry out characterize visitors while the those with vulnerable accessory, and the unlock interaction, opinion, fulfillment, cohesion and you will relationship variations, and contract details perform characterize her or him once the individuals with safer connection appearance.
This is a decimal, cross-sectional research that utilizes a detailed and you may explanatory structure. The minimum age of male applicants https://datingranking.net/chinese-dating/ was 20 and limitation is 79 (M = ; SD = ). Minimal age people people are 18 and restriction was 76 (Yards = ; SD = ) ( Desk step one).
1) Sociodemographic survey: The survey of the sociodemographic properties of users is actually carried aside due to a survey which have 14 concerns that examined: years, intimate positioning, place of residence, marital status, duration of latest matchmaking, lifestyle out of a previous relationships, period of earlier in the day relationships, knowledge, doing work beyond your house, workload, individual earnings, quantity of people and faith.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, A good., Sarriera, J. (2008). A great qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de- ): This new dispute level are divided into a couple subscales: in the first, called “conflict-disagreement”, nine items are showed and must end up being examined with the a half a dozen-part Likert level regarding your volume with which the reasons getting dispute expressed took place the final seasons, between “rarely” in order to half dozen “pretty much every go out”. From the second subscale, named “conflict-aggression”, around three products are exhibited discussing the intensity of problems, such should be analyzed towards a beneficial Likert size of 5 points between “never” in order to four “always”. Regarding the investigation in order to adapt the size of English to Portuguese, a good Cronbach’s Alpha out of 0.71 was discover. Inside data, Cronbach’s thinking was 0.80 for men and you may 0.77 for women.